Official Reviews vs. User Reviews:
The site offers substantially more 'expert' reviews than user reviews. I think this is due to the amount of different cameras listed, many of which are not sold in regular electronic stores and are less commercially popular. The user reviews are limited in what is included, but the official reviews are extensive and seemingly well researched.
An example of official review...
This site's major downfall is that it is very specific in its readership. At times the information featured in the review is overwhelming and goes on for numerous pages which could cause less camera knowledgeable individuals to lose interest.
User added content is less well researched and more focused on personal experience with the given camera. Many times the comments are misspelled and seem to be written during a passionate camera induced rage. See below;
Some user review/opinions...
Credibility:
I find the reviews credible but am concerned that the site's vast participation of paid experts leaves opportunity for product placement and false achievement. But compared to the user generated reviews I find the articles very well researched. They answer almost every question that one could have but if there is still something missing it can be found through participation in the discussion board. Once again I would highly recommend this site for photographers or camera enthusiasts because it had more information in one source than I have come across on any other site.
I think you found that this is an "expert" site--which can be good and/or daunting. I use it all of the time. Whether it is unbiased or not..., I can't tell.
ReplyDelete